PC systems worth testing, 6/7. Sourced demo preview; this is not a hands-on verdict.
Soulstonia is built around a party that keeps working even when you stop giving direct orders. The developer’s Steam page offers a demo and describes Summoners who can gather, craft, fight and explore autonomously, with direct control available whenever you want it. Its current Early Access listing is 10 December 2026. The pitch sounds cozy. The strategic question is whether “autonomous” means helpful teammates or a small committee quietly spending your resources on nonsense.
Delegation should create choices
In a good party system, specialists make the player think about priorities. Send someone to mine and you may delay equipment. Send everybody to fight and the camp economy falls behind. Soulstonia describes individual traits and goals, creature summons and a procedurally generated world. I want to know whether those systems produce meaningful delegation, not just a longer list of chores that completes itself while I make tea.
The developer has already posted a demo patch aimed at clearer onboarding. That is a good sign for a system with many moving parts, but a patch note is a promise about intent, not a verdict on execution. The test is simple: after half an hour, can I explain why my party succeeded or failed?
The TGN read
This is a first look based on official information. I have not tested the demo for this piece. I am interested in the long game: can idle and direct control coexist without one making the other pointless? If the answer is yes, this could be a lovely little management trap. If not, I have enough unread task lists already.
Should TGN build a party? Say so on Instagram. If people want more, I will make gameplay that tests delegation against direct control.
For the next TGN update, use the TGN all-links hub.